It protects the legal rights of lesbian and gay couples and allows them the well-deserved opportunity of actualizing their love in matrimony. So, they might tell themselves, I do not need to marry or stay married to the mother of my children. As one would concur, even some heterosexual couples are not able to sire their own children and resort to adopting one or even more. Removal Request, argumentative essay against gay marriage. News Press Releases Op-Eds Washington Update Blog. Yes No.
Argumentative Essay on Same Sex Marriage
He has served in various leadership positions including a position as chairperson of the National Endowment for the humanities. He has produced various write-ups concerning cultural issues in America. These include books and articles. His thesis is that gay marriage should not be legalized. The legalization of gay marriage in any society leads to social damage and the destruction of the normal structure of the family. Bennett has for a long time been involved in the argumentative essay against gay marriage in the fighting of same-sex marriages in the United States.
He argues that argumentative essay against gay marriage is a social issue that may be detrimental to the values held in the society. He was disturbed because the Hawaii Supreme Court was considering legalizing same-sex marriage. He argued that if Hawaii were to make gay marriages legal, many nations would embrace it too. Bennett terms the arguments made in favor of gay marriages as shrewd arguments Bennett,argumentative essay against gay marriage, p. Bennett shows his concern about the value of marriage, given that gay marriages are legalized. He goes ahead to warn the audience not to take the step. He argues that the marriage institution is fragile already and legalizing same-sex marriage would only make things worse.
He continues to mention that all religions only support marriage between a man and a woman and he believes that this is not mere coincidence. Bennett criticizes the work by Sullivan saying that his argument is baseless as he describes marriage same-sex marriage as an open contract where the single, moralistic model is not honored. Bennett believes that the essence of marriage is faithfulness and some things such as adultery are not encouraged. This is unlike in gay marriages where they are encouraged to explore Bennett,p. The author is against gay marriage due to the implications it may have on the younger generation Bennett,p.
He argues that those born in such a society would be confused due to the existence of both homosexuality and heterosexuality. Bennett argues that if gay marriage were to be legalized, several changes would occur including in the education system. Students will need to be taught about gay marriage and made to understand that one could have two mothers or fathers. In conclusion, Bennett argues that the marriage institution has suffered enough due to several issues and there is no need for making things worse by introducing same-sex marriage Bennett,p. The information provided by Bennett accurate and logical. He argues that Sullivan supports gay marriage and yet the practices in such marriages do not follow the principles in marriage faithfulness and fidelity. He also argues that if all religions believe that marriage is meant to be between a man and a woman, then his argument is true.
He provides arguments in a clear and logical argumentative essay against gay marriage in such a way as to convince the reader of the ills associated with same-sex marriage. I agree with Bennett that gay marriages are unhealthy to the society. On the other hand, Sullivan argues that same-sex marriage is good for Americans Sullivan, Bennett argues against gay marriages and advices the readers not to consider legalizing homosexuality. He believes that it would lead to social damage and further demean the marriage institution. Bennett, W. Marriage and Family in Americ a : Against gay marriage. New York: Sage. Laycock, D. Same-sex marriage and religious liberty: Emerging conflicts. Sullivan, A. Why gay marriage is good for straight America. Newsweek Magazine, argumentative essay against gay marriage, p.
Need a custom Essay sample argumentative essay against gay marriage from scratch by professional specifically for you? certified writers online. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. If you continue, argumentative essay against gay marriage, we will assume that you agree to our Cookies Policy, argumentative essay against gay marriage. Table of Contents. Introduction Summary Evaluation Conclusion References. Learn More. Bennett specifically for you! Bennett by yourself? Bennett was written and submitted by your fellow student. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly.
Removal Request. If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda. Concept of Gender Intersectionality in Society Legalizing Gay Marriage. GET WRITING HELP. Cite This paper. Select a referencing style:. Copy to Clipboard Copied! APA-6 MLA-8 Chicago N-B Chicago A-D Harvard. Reference IvyPanda. Bibliography IvyPanda. References IvyPanda. More related papers. Check the price of your paper. If you continue, we will assume that you agree to our Cookies Policy OK.
mla style essays
Same sex partners can easily adopt and bring up children if their marriage is legalized and recognized by the society in which they live Gerstmann, As one would concur, even some heterosexual couples are not able to sire their own children and resort to adopting one or even more. This is a right that should be extended to same sex couples too given that they may not be able to give birth on their own. Further, same sex marriage does no harm whatsoever to the institution of marriage, and is potentially more stable. This makes it quite uncalled for to argue against or prohibit gay marriages. In yet another study, only 1. This implies that heterosexual marriages have a slightly higher dissolution rate on average than opposite sex marriages.
It could then be argued that gay marriages are more stable than traditional man-woman marriages. The two types of marriages should thus be given equal chance because neither affects the other negatively. They also have more or less equal chances of succeeding if legally recognized and accepted. Opponents of same sex marriage may argue that it is important for children to have a father and a mother. They may say that for children to have a good balance in their upbringing, they should be influenced by a father and a mother in their developmental years. Such arguments hold that homosexual couples only have one gender influence over the lives of children and that this is less fulfilling Badgett, However, the arguments fail to recognize that children under the parental care of same sex couples get to mingle with both male and female genders in various social places.
At school, the children get to be cared for and mentored by both male and female teachers who more or less serve almost the same role as parents. Those who are opposed to same sex unions may also argue that such marriages reduce sanctity of marriage. To them, marriage is a religious and traditional commitment and ceremony that is held very sacred by people. They contend that there is need to do everything possible to preserve marriage because as an institution, it has been degrading slowly over time. Their concern is that traditional marriages are being devalued by same sex marriages which are swaying people away from being married and instead choosing to live with same sex partners Nagle, It is clear here that such arguments treat marriage as a man-woman union only and are thus not cognizant of the true meaning of marriage.
Moreover, they fail to recognize that traditions and religions should not be used against same sex couples because there are people who do not ascribe to any tradition s or religions. Same sex marriage is a human right that should be enjoyed just like traditional heterosexual marriages. It protects the legal rights of lesbian and gay couples and allows them the well-deserved opportunity of actualizing their love in matrimony. In addition, it enables them to exercise their right to start families and bring up children.
Arguments made against this form of marriage, such as that it undermines traditional marriages, are based on opinions and not facts. Moreover, it is not important for a child to have a father and a mother because there are other places in which they actively interact with people of different sexes. As such, it is only fair that all governments consider legalizing gay marriages. Badgett, M. Patterns of relationship recognition by same-sex couples in the United States [PDF]. The Williams Institute. When gay people get married: what happens when societies legalize same-sex marriage.
New York, NY: NYU Press. Gerstmann, E. Same-sex marriage and the constitution. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Langbein, L. Same-sex marriage and negative externalities. Social Science Quarterly , 90 2 , Nagle, J. Same-sex marriage: the debate. New York, NY: The Rosen Publishing Group. Winter, B. Bennett terms the arguments made in favor of gay marriages as shrewd arguments Bennett, , p. Bennett shows his concern about the value of marriage, given that gay marriages are legalized. He goes ahead to warn the audience not to take the step.
He argues that the marriage institution is fragile already and legalizing same-sex marriage would only make things worse. He continues to mention that all religions only support marriage between a man and a woman and he believes that this is not mere coincidence. Bennett criticizes the work by Sullivan saying that his argument is baseless as he describes marriage same-sex marriage as an open contract where the single, moralistic model is not honored. Bennett believes that the essence of marriage is faithfulness and some things such as adultery are not encouraged. This is unlike in gay marriages where they are encouraged to explore Bennett, , p.
The author is against gay marriage due to the implications it may have on the younger generation Bennett, , p. He argues that those born in such a society would be confused due to the existence of both homosexuality and heterosexuality. Bennett argues that if gay marriage were to be legalized, several changes would occur including in the education system. Students will need to be taught about gay marriage and made to understand that one could have two mothers or fathers. In conclusion, Bennett argues that the marriage institution has suffered enough due to several issues and there is no need for making things worse by introducing same-sex marriage Bennett, , p.
The information provided by Bennett accurate and logical. He argues that Sullivan supports gay marriage and yet the practices in such marriages do not follow the principles in marriage faithfulness and fidelity. He also argues that if all religions believe that marriage is meant to be between a man and a woman, then his argument is true. He provides arguments in a clear and logical manner in such a way as to convince the reader of the ills associated with same-sex marriage. I agree with Bennett that gay marriages are unhealthy to the society. On the other hand, Sullivan argues that same-sex marriage is good for Americans Sullivan, Bennett argues against gay marriages and advices the readers not to consider legalizing homosexuality.
He believes that it would lead to social damage and further demean the marriage institution. Bennett, W. Marriage and Family in Americ a : Against gay marriage. New York: Sage. Laycock, D. Same-sex marriage and religious liberty: Emerging conflicts. Sullivan, A. Why gay marriage is good for straight America. Newsweek Magazine, p. Need a custom Essay sample written from scratch by professional specifically for you? certified writers online.
No comments:
Post a Comment